Best Running Feature: Wednesday's Movie Mashup
Best Festival/Awards Coverage: 30 Days of Oscar
Best Podcast: Reel Insight
Thank you!!
Category/Movie | Author | Blog |
The Social Network | Tom | Movies Reviews by Tom Clift |
Toy Story 3 | Marshall | Marshall and the Movies |
The King’s Speech | Jenny | 10 Things I hate about your movie |
Black Swan | Julian | Movies and Other things |
Inception | Adam | Hope lies |
True Grit | Clarabela | Just Chick Flicks |
TBD | Yong | Yongs Fave Films |
The Fighter | CS | Big Thoughts from a Small Mind |
TBD | Jess | Insight into Entertainment |
TBD | Duncan | The Kinematoscope |
Best Director | Sebastian | Films from the Supermassive Black Hole |
Best Actor | Univarn | A Life in Equinox |
Best Supporting Actor | Aiden | Cut the Crap Movie reviews |
Best Actress | Andrew | Encore’s World of Film & TV |
Best Supporting Actress | Phil | Phil on Film |
Best Original Screenplay | Jason | The Athletic Nerd |
Best Adapted Screenplay | Jason | The Entertainment Junkie |
Cinematography | James | Cinema Sights |
Art Direction | Larry | The Movie Snob |
Costume Design | Rich | Wide Screen World |
Sound Mixing | Jason | Invasion of the B movies |
Editing | Hatter | Dark of the Matinee |
Sound Editing | Red | Anomalous Material |
Visual Effects | Jason | The Entertainment Junkie |
Makeup | Rachel | Rachel’s Reel Reviews |
Original Song | Travis | The Movie Encyclopedia |
Original Score | Robert | His eyes were watching movies |
Animated Short | Dylan | Blog Cabins |
Live action Short | Branden | Foolish Blatherings |
Documentary Feature | Nick | Random Ramblings of a Demented Doorknob |
Documentary Short | Kevyn | The Cinematheque |
Foreign Film | Colin | Pick n Mix Flix |
Animated Film | Stevee | Cinematic Paradox |

In case you haven't gotten enough of my voice this week, there are two more chances to fill the void. Episode 38 of the Lambcast is now available. I chatted with my partner in crime, Rachel, as well as the LAMB old guard Dylan, Nick, and Jason. We discussed our most anticipated films for the rest of the year. Check it out on itunes or listen below. And in a last minute guest spot, I appeared on the MILFcast (also on itunes, Episode 6 or so). Some new friends were made, possibly a marriage proposal, and lots of suggestive talk. It was pretty funny.
The latest movie from Jane Campion, the Oscar-winning screenwriter and director of The Piano, has created another similarly dour period piece with moments of terrific acting, but not a particularly interesting love story that has all the complexity of its hero's Wikipedia page. John Keats is a penniless poet who falls in love with an emerging fashionista Fanny Brawne who cannot considering marrying such a poor person, but wants to learn from him about poetry. Campion assumes everyone watching has mind-reading capabilities as she spends long scenes just letting us look at the characters looking at each other. There's a terrific scene when Keats' roommate, Mr. Brown, sends Fanny a valentine as an insulting joke, and proves that Fanny has no skills at anything but flirting and sewing. I found it hard to believe the love story that ensues. Many movies that describe an artist and his muse often rely on the fact that the woman is as in love with the art as with the man. This is not true, though Fanny seems to appreciate parts of Keats' poetry, she constantly talks about how she isn't an expert in poetry. The movie fails to give another reason for their love affair, though they do make it seem extremely tragic that it never develops as Keats dies at 25 of tuberculosis. Overall, I wasn't impressed with Bright Star. Almost Famous makes the love story and struggles of artists more believeable and interesting and Pride and Prejudice does a better job with a period piece. 2 of 5 stars/lambs
The Young Victoria tells the story of Britain's Queen Victoria from just before her ascension through the beginning of her reign and marriage. She reigned from 1837 to 1901, the longest of any female monarch in global history. This means, the make-up must be appropriate for the 19th century. In addition, it seems that the Academy has lumped hair design into the category for makeup. The two nominees for Young Victoria, Jenny Shircore and John Henry Gordon, are both listed (on IMDB) as hair stylists/designers, and Ms. Shircore is listed as the makeup designer. She also won the Oscar for Elizabeth. Lumping them together makes sense to me if you think of it as all of the things done to a character that are not costumes be one award. The makeup throughout the movie made Emily Blunt look young, fresh, and regal, and the hair styles of all the characters put them into a recognizable time period. Victoria has to battle between the influences of British politicians and German/Belgian relatives and politicians. The hair styles, while perhaps not perfectly accurate, did make it easy to visually distinguish between the two without being too strange. Given that Benjamin Button won last year, and this is a good movie overall, I expect this to win the Oscar. You can read my full review of the movie here.
Star Trek could give Victoria a run for the money if the Academy loves sci-fi as much as I do. The nominees are Barney Burman (prosthetic makeup designer), Mindy Hall (makeup), and Joel Harlow (prosthetic makeup supervisor). All are first time nominees, but have tons of movies to their credit. I would give them the award for the sole reason that I had no idea Eric Bana was even in the movie thanks to the insane amount of prosthetic make up that made him into a very Trek-appropriate bad guy. Also, their challenge of making beloved characters come to life in different actors at a younger age while still trying to make them seem like they bel
ong in 2009 rather than 1970. There were lots of other "species" of characters throughout the movie that fit in seamlessly, which is a huge credit to the make-up department. So while I do think Victoria will take the award given the Academy's recent history of period pieces, they have a split history of giving the award to incredible prosthetic work so don't count Star Trek out.
ous film festival circuits winning some awards, mostly for acting. It did win the Italian version of the Oscars in this category however. In fact, the two nominees for this movie are the most nominated of the bunch. Vittorio Sodano (prosthetic make up designer) and Aldo Signoretti (key hair stylist) were nominated together for Apocalypto, and Signoretti was nominated for Moulin Rouge as well. Since I doubt many people saw this (it had a limited release last April in addition to the film festivals), I'll summarize it. It's a story about the former Prime Minister in Italy, Guilio Andreotti, who was accused of ties to the mafia and negative ties with the Vatican, and basically follows him and his family through various accusations from his political opponents of murdering people who got in his way. The movie won the Jury Prize at Cannes, but having seen the movie I have no idea why it was nominated in this category. All the people look fairly normal, though given the titles of the nominees, I presume several are wearing prosthetic pieces. Nothing particularly interesting struck me, so I highly doubt this movie has any chance of winning.
This post is part of the L.A.M.Blog-thon Chapter 3 regarding remakes.
you never find a reason Elizabeth falls in love with him. The dialogue is trimmed from the original Austen texted, and occasionally diverging from her words to create new ones (less good ones!). But what bothers me are the details, the costumes are inconsistent, inappropriate and Keira Knightly always appears windblown and frumpy when all women of the period did was make sure they looked good. The movie exaggerates all the character traits - Elizabeth doesn't care about what people think of her, Mr. Darcy is super pompous, and Mrs. Bennett perfectly shrill. However, the people of Austen's time were more about understatement than exaggeration. It just doesn't represent the original work well, nor does it represent a good remake of the BBC version.
The L.A.M.Blog-a-Thon this month is celebrating the people in entertainment that we are thankful exist and practice their craft. "The catch is, it can't be a director or actor. Those cats just get too much love already, don't you think? With these posts you can focus on anyone working in the film industry from any time period from any country that isn't a director or actor. It is okay, though, if the person has done both directing and acting, so long as your post acknowledges their exceptional work in another part of the filmmaking process." While my choice already gets a lot of love, I am yet again thankful for his work. Aaron Sorkin. Writer.
I know it's Tuesday and you were probably looking forward to a new post about the top-grossing movie of one of the last few years. However, something very important has come up and I need to ask for your help.
Thanks to all your support, dear readers, Lara Croft and I made into Round 2 of the LAMB Action Hero. We're up against John McClane from the Die Hard series of films. The idea is to argue who would make the better roomate. Go check it out if you have a chance, and of course vote for Lara!