There are always going to be the optimal audience members for a given film. Sometimes movie makers make that group so specific that it's possible no one will know they were supposed to be part of it. I'm a little afraid Paul will be part of that group of movies, with no one aware that this movie was made for them. Going in, I had no idea this movie was made for me. **No spoilers if you've seen the trailer or cast list**
Paul reteams the stars of Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead, Nick Frost and Simon Pegg - Clive and Graham respectively. This time, they're more laid back, but in a naive way, with longer hair, a bit more fluff around the middle, and a more happy go lucky attitude. They have arrived at Comic-Con, the Mecca for geeks, nerds, dweebs and movie-fans alike. Clive has even written a science fiction novel (about a woman with three tits - apparently that extra tit is a source of endless amusement) and they get their hero's signature. After Comic-con they set off on a road trip adventure in an RV to visit all of the UFO/alien sites across the US. I'll admit, these went a little beyond my personal nerd knowledge, but it's really enough to know they have something to do with a sighting/abduction/landing. Then they witness a car crash and getting out to help, they meet Paul. About 4' tall, large head, no shirt (just pants - like Mickey Mouse), and a Seth Rogan mouth - literally and figuratively, he does the voice. Paul is on the run and needs help (the exact reasons are explained slowly). After Clive (Frost) faints, Graham agrees to help Paul get away.
This is where the I'll try not to spoil the rest - but you can assume, since Paul is on the run, someone must be out to get him. We get to watch two of the most bumbling agents (Bill Hader and Joe Lo Truglio) try to figure out what they're looking for and where it is after tough guy, Jason Batemen yells at them at every turn. Batemen is being controlled by "the Big Guy" who isn't revealed until the end (though the voice is pretty recognizable). Our troublesome trio (Clive, Graham and Paul) spend the night at a trailer park and kidnap Bible-thumper, Ruth (Kristin Wiig) because she saw Paul. All along, we get glimpses of Paul's story - how he got to earth, why he's been locked up, what special skills he posseses, and how he'll get back home.
Greg Mottola directed Superbad and Adventureland, and if you've seen those, you know what you're in for with Paul, and it more than lives up to the other two (one of which I did NOT like). It's more for a grown up group of sci-fi nerds. There are homages to every single franchise (some more direct than others), and a guest voice appearance when we learn the real source of E.T.. Twilight Zone, The X-files, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. make an entrance. I'm sure there were more (Doctor Who, comic books) but that was the extent of my knowledge and I laughed my ass off. Pegg and Frost are their always winning buddy-duo with many recurring jokes and nods to their other work together. Terrific fun - if you fall into any of the demographics to find elements of this funny. If you have a nerdy bone in your body, this movie is for you. 3.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sci-fi. Show all posts
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Avatar: Review (minor spoilers)

James Cameron has truly changed the art of movie-making in many ways. The ability to actually capture an actor's performance and then morph that performance into a different species with different shapes and environments is amazing. The sci-fi genre may never be the same (or many others either, given the imagination of Hollywood). However, he's still James Cameron, and wrote the movie too, so the inspiration of other movies in the past kept hitting me. The one that keeps sticking is that Avatar is what might have happened if Dances with Wolves had ended differently. However, the movie-making skill and futuristic (rather than historic) story gave Cameron the chance to tell a story without stooping to basic cliches. He only spends moments (in a very long 160 minute movie) describing how avatars work, or Worthington learning the language, or basic information about the Navi. But the collective whole of the movie gives you all the information you need to understand a beautiful story. Much of the back story is told through voice-overs from Worthington's video diaries. I went in knowing how long the movie would be, so I was conscious of when trimming might have been done, and honestly there were few moments even a couple of seconds could be cut, and definitely never an entire scene.


Sunday, September 27, 2009
New Release: Surrogates

=

** If you haven't seen commercials for this, there will be spoilers, however, I'm not revealing anything that isn't obvious from the trailer. **
Bruce Willis' new movie, Surrogates, follows a police detective trying to figure out who and what could have started killing humans, by killing their synthetic surrogates. The future is "peopled" with machines that aren't sentient, but can do everything their human operators are thinking, and relay back all the images they are seeing. So, humans can stay in their home forever, while a better version of themselves, physically, can walk the world. The machines were designed for people with disabilities, so they could more normally experience the world. However, the rest of the world became addicted to never having to wash their hair, or exercise, or get dressed, instead sending their surrogate out in the world to represent them while they operated it from the safety of their home. But someone has made a weapon that will kill a human by destroying their surrogate. Bruce Willis and his partner,Radha Mitchell, investigate leads that bring them to one of the "reservations" of people who refuse to use surrogates, no machines allowed. Lots of complicated ethical questions prevail, but none are developed too deeply, so the movie stays at a light level throughout, though the fight scenes are pretty fun given that machines are doing a lot of the fighting. I think if Bruce Willis' character had been written more like his Die Hard or The Fifth Element characters, this movie would have been more fun along the same lines as those movies. Instead Willis is flat, and none of his dialogue is memorable, which is disappointing given his skill at sarcasm and grouchy cop banter. It's a pretty good movie, and fits well into it's futuristic, sci-fi genre, arguing that to be fully human, you need to experience the world yourself, much like the better Matrix and I, Robot argue convincingly. 3.5 stars/lambs


Bruce Willis' new movie, Surrogates, follows a police detective trying to figure out who and what could have started killing humans, by killing their synthetic surrogates. The future is "peopled" with machines that aren't sentient, but can do everything their human operators are thinking, and relay back all the images they are seeing. So, humans can stay in their home forever, while a better version of themselves, physically, can walk the world. The machines were designed for people with disabilities, so they could more normally experience the world. However, the rest of the world became addicted to never having to wash their hair, or exercise, or get dressed, instead sending their surrogate out in the world to represent them while they operated it from the safety of their home. But someone has made a weapon that will kill a human by destroying their surrogate. Bruce Willis and his partner,Radha Mitchell, investigate leads that bring them to one of the "reservations" of people who refuse to use surrogates, no machines allowed. Lots of complicated ethical questions prevail, but none are developed too deeply, so the movie stays at a light level throughout, though the fight scenes are pretty fun given that machines are doing a lot of the fighting. I think if Bruce Willis' character had been written more like his Die Hard or The Fifth Element characters, this movie would have been more fun along the same lines as those movies. Instead Willis is flat, and none of his dialogue is memorable, which is disappointing given his skill at sarcasm and grouchy cop banter. It's a pretty good movie, and fits well into it's futuristic, sci-fi genre, arguing that to be fully human, you need to experience the world yourself, much like the better Matrix and I, Robot argue convincingly. 3.5 stars/lambs


Monday, May 11, 2009
Star Trek: Revew

Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Great new TV - "Fringe"



Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
2 stars
2.5 stars
3 stars
3.5 stars
4 stars
4.5 stars
5 lambs
5 stars
Alphabet Meme
Animated movies
British TV
Christmas
Comments
DVD
Father's Day
Favela Rising
Friday Night Lights
Golden Globes
Independent film
LAMB
Lists
Monday musicals
Movie meme
New Releases
Oscar Nominations
Oscar winners
Random
Reel Insight
Robert Downey Jr.
TV Shows
TV meme
The West Wing
Top-Grossing
Tuesdays
action movie
actors
actresses
awards
bad movies
battlestar galactica
best movies
blockbusters
blog cabins
bloggers
characters
chick flicks
classics
comedy
documentary
dramas
emmys
epic
family films
fashion
females
final season
foreign films
friends
good movies
great cast
guest post
holidays
james mcavoy
kevin smith
kids
kids movies
marketing mistakes
movie from book
movies
music from movies
musicals
old movies
period pieces
podcasts
predictions
romance
sci-fi
songs
sports
straight to DVD
summer candy
why i love