Sometimes there are great movies because the acting is amazing. And sometimes the story is so unique it blows you away just by expanding your mind a little bit. Sometimes a movie is just so beautiful you just have to respect it as great. However, The Lincoln Lawyer is none of these things, but it's still a great movie, which is why I saw it 3 days ago and the review is just coming now.
Matthew McConaughey is back to his serious fare (his shirt only comes off once I believe). He plays Mick Haller, a defense attorney whose office is in the back of his town car, driven by Earl (Laurence Mason) because Mick lost his license (it never says, but I'm guessing for driving under the influence of something). Mick has a relationship with the local bail bondsman, Val (John Leguizamo), who throws him some lucrative cases. That is how Louis Roulet (Ryan Phillipe) comes into Mick's life. He's been accused of beating up and attempting to rape a woman. He claims innocence and even guesses she might be a gold-digger looking for his money, since his mother's LOADED. Mick takes the case (for a lot of money) and gets his investigator Frank (William H. Macy with lots of scruffy hair) to help and get all the dirt.
Mick's biggest worry is that he'll represent someone and not be able to tell whether or not they are truly innocent. Most other attorneys (particularly for the defense) don't care about that - they just put on the best case they can to defend their client. Mick wants to be sure it's also the best thing FOR his client. However, Mick's as slick as they come - he gets bikers to do some dirty work by promising to represent their members, if he's not paid, he'll let you rot in jail, he cons his clients out of money. But at his core, you still have to wonder which side he'll come down on when it actually matters.
His ex-wife (Marisa Tomei) is a prosecutor and obviously still in love with his charm and aging boyish looks. They have a daughter together and these relationships show us the cracks in Mick's armor. He has to represent dangerous clients, but always know that is family is safe. And until he meets a pretty boy with a lot of money, he's never worried about it. Louis Roulet is someone he has NEVER had to work for, and doesn't play by the same rules.
The legal issues being discussed are really great - what do you do if you know your client is much worse than he's being accused of? How do you bring justice to his victims when you're bound by attorney-client privilege? The movie takes us on this whirlwind tour with Mick, and you NEVER see it coming. Very well made movie. The entire audience gasped during one of the climax scenes. Great movie theater experience.
The music and the close-ups make this movie feel real. I've never been to Los Angeles (the setting) and I can't say I've listened to much rap or "gangster" music in my life. But whatever the director (Brad Furman - hopefully going to do more great things) did, I felt like I knew these people, and these characters. They weren't cliched (okay, asking his black driver Earl to get him a gun was both racist AND cliched) and the music worked perfectly to bridge the gap between scenes.
This is probably evident from the trailer alone, but being able to come up with a title as unique and simple as The Lincoln Lawyer is not a common occurrence these days. Mick wants to be just and a little bit noble - like our former president, but he also does all of his business from a Lincoln town car. I will say, having a title that drives (pun intended) you into the story is something I gotta say I like.
A note about the marketing of this movie - they got it right on the money. The trailer shows you what the movie's about, but doesn't give you the best lines or scenes. One scene from the trailer is not even in the movie, but is exactly a tone the movie uses. Several of the scenes are much more complex than the trailer lets you in on. For a nice change, you can find out whether this movie will interest you (it should), but not have a clue about the film itself.
Finally - 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Showing posts with label 4.5 stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 4.5 stars. Show all posts
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Saturday, March 12, 2011
New Release: Rango and The Adjustment Bureau
There's not a lot to say about either because both benefit from only knowing what the trailers showed you. So there won't be any spoilers.
Rango is the story of a terrarium chameleon who has to survive for himself and wanders into a town called Dirt that is experiencing a water shortage. He gets deputized to keep the peace, and of course wanders into the corruption going on, but wants to rise above it and do something important. They add all of the elements you'd expect with a chameleon in the desert - escaping bit predators, the sun, heat, water, etc. But what makes this movie something more than just another kids animated feature comes in 2 ways. First, the animation is a jump above. The detail in all the scales and whiskers and whatnot on all the desert creatures bests anything that's come before. And second, the story is more complex than necessary for just a children's movie - it approaches many of the old westerns without going into cliche. The dialogue is sharp with Johnny Depp's standard delivery reigned in a bit. My only problem with it was the strange use of props. In an early scene Depp is escaping an eagle by hiding in a standard glass bottle. Then later, each of the desert creatures carries a bottle or can or vase perfectly scaled to their own body size. It left an odd feeling for me - it would have been one thing if all the items they use are really "human" sized things OR the creatures are considered human size and their possessions equivalent. Just bothered me. Overall, a really good movie that can only be appreciated with multiple viewings. 4 of 5 stars/lambs
The Adjustment Bureau also felt a bit like a throwback to an older version of cinema (and maybe it was just the fedoras - Fletch said the Adjustment Bureau guys should team up or face off against the bowler hat guys from The Thomas Crowne Affair and I finally got the joke seeing the whole movie!). The movie starts us with David Norris (Matt Damon) screwing up his first NY Senate bid, and conceding the election. He meets straight talking Elise (Emily Blunt) in the bathroom before the speech and he realizes he's become a little different than the man he intended to be. There are also these guys in fedoras following them around,
Anthony Mackie (from The Hurt Locker) and John Slattery (from Mad Men) seems to know something about what's going on. And from the trailer we know they having something to do with controlling people's destinies. And, it is NOT David and Elise's destiny to be together - though they have other plans. The movie explores whether we have free will and our life is made up of only an accumulation of our choices or if there's a predestined plan that you cannot escape from. The Adjustment Bureau makes sure to keep you on their boss's plan. It's a terrific love story, with a really well paced plot and doesn't overdo it on the details of how the Adjustment Bureau really works. I liked that it makes you think about your own life if there really might be a group of people attempting to get you to a particular destiny and therefore, everything you do or people you meet will help you get there. It kind of explains why my clumsiness hasn't killed me already - I must have more of a plan ahead. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Rango is the story of a terrarium chameleon who has to survive for himself and wanders into a town called Dirt that is experiencing a water shortage. He gets deputized to keep the peace, and of course wanders into the corruption going on, but wants to rise above it and do something important. They add all of the elements you'd expect with a chameleon in the desert - escaping bit predators, the sun, heat, water, etc. But what makes this movie something more than just another kids animated feature comes in 2 ways. First, the animation is a jump above. The detail in all the scales and whiskers and whatnot on all the desert creatures bests anything that's come before. And second, the story is more complex than necessary for just a children's movie - it approaches many of the old westerns without going into cliche. The dialogue is sharp with Johnny Depp's standard delivery reigned in a bit. My only problem with it was the strange use of props. In an early scene Depp is escaping an eagle by hiding in a standard glass bottle. Then later, each of the desert creatures carries a bottle or can or vase perfectly scaled to their own body size. It left an odd feeling for me - it would have been one thing if all the items they use are really "human" sized things OR the creatures are considered human size and their possessions equivalent. Just bothered me. Overall, a really good movie that can only be appreciated with multiple viewings. 4 of 5 stars/lambs
The Adjustment Bureau also felt a bit like a throwback to an older version of cinema (and maybe it was just the fedoras - Fletch said the Adjustment Bureau guys should team up or face off against the bowler hat guys from The Thomas Crowne Affair and I finally got the joke seeing the whole movie!). The movie starts us with David Norris (Matt Damon) screwing up his first NY Senate bid, and conceding the election. He meets straight talking Elise (Emily Blunt) in the bathroom before the speech and he realizes he's become a little different than the man he intended to be. There are also these guys in fedoras following them around,
Anthony Mackie (from The Hurt Locker) and John Slattery (from Mad Men) seems to know something about what's going on. And from the trailer we know they having something to do with controlling people's destinies. And, it is NOT David and Elise's destiny to be together - though they have other plans. The movie explores whether we have free will and our life is made up of only an accumulation of our choices or if there's a predestined plan that you cannot escape from. The Adjustment Bureau makes sure to keep you on their boss's plan. It's a terrific love story, with a really well paced plot and doesn't overdo it on the details of how the Adjustment Bureau really works. I liked that it makes you think about your own life if there really might be a group of people attempting to get you to a particular destiny and therefore, everything you do or people you meet will help you get there. It kind of explains why my clumsiness hasn't killed me already - I must have more of a plan ahead. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Friday, March 4, 2011
DVD Roundup: Pirate Radio and Get Low
I didn't expect to enjoy Pirate Radio because in general I'm not a great audiophile and 60s British rock, other than Beatles doesn't ring my bell. However, as I suspected, I'm way overgeneralizing my taste in music, and there was a ton of great music to enjoy in this. Pirate Radio tells the real story of illegal radio stations that broadcast Rock and Roll in the 1960s by having their "station" on a ship in the North Sea. Bill Nighy owns the boat, and at the beginning he's bringing a friend's son, Carl (Tom Sturridge) on board to give him a new start. On board are all the DJs, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Nick Frost, and a bunch of British comedic actors whose names I didn't know, but were pretty funny. They eventually bring a famous DJ Rhys Ifans to save them after they lose sponsors.
We see some of the story through Carl's eyes - the drugs, the sex, etc., but it's fairly uneven. As a second storyline, we meet Kenneth Branagh and Tom Davenport as government ministers tasked with making the Pirate Radio stations illegal. This takes them more than a year to figure out laws they can pass or rules to set up for a good reason that will stop the radio stations. They're basically assholes, but it's funny watching them try. Overall, it's a good movie, if incredibly uneven in its story telling. But at least there's pretty great music over it all. 3 of 5 stars/lambs
Get Low should have been present in some form on Oscar night - sadly it was only present at the Independent Spirit Awards for First Feature and Supporting Male (Bill Murray). I loved this movie. Robert Duvall stars as Felix Bush, a curmudgeon living out in the woods by himself in 1930s Tennessee. His is notified of the death of a friend, and it seems to spark the desire to find out what the world thinks of him. It's obvious he's been alone for a long time, enough that legend has built up around him that's as much fiction as fact. He tries to get the minister (Gerald McRaney) to throw a funeral before he dies so he can find out what people would say, but he won't do it. However, a young assistant at the local funeral home, Buddy (Lucas Black) overhears this and realizes the business it could bring to the failing funeral home run by Frank Quinn (Bill Murray). So they offer to set up the "funeral party" for Mr. Bush. While in town, he runs into an old friend (maybe the only person to have really known him), Mattie Darrow (Sissy Spacek).
Everything is going smoothly for the party, but Felix wants to get someone who knows everything about him to tell the truth about it. Whatever is in his past is too hard for him to talk about, and he tries to find an old friend to do it for him. I won't reveal the secrets that come up, but the movie tells the story really well, not giving too much weight to the secret or the past, but reminding us that we all carry them with us. I really liked all the acting in this movie - particularly Lucas Black. I first saw him in Crazy in Alabama with Melanie Griffith. She's over the top, but he's pretty amazing, and now he's grown up to be a pretty powerful screen presence. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
We see some of the story through Carl's eyes - the drugs, the sex, etc., but it's fairly uneven. As a second storyline, we meet Kenneth Branagh and Tom Davenport as government ministers tasked with making the Pirate Radio stations illegal. This takes them more than a year to figure out laws they can pass or rules to set up for a good reason that will stop the radio stations. They're basically assholes, but it's funny watching them try. Overall, it's a good movie, if incredibly uneven in its story telling. But at least there's pretty great music over it all. 3 of 5 stars/lambs
Get Low should have been present in some form on Oscar night - sadly it was only present at the Independent Spirit Awards for First Feature and Supporting Male (Bill Murray). I loved this movie. Robert Duvall stars as Felix Bush, a curmudgeon living out in the woods by himself in 1930s Tennessee. His is notified of the death of a friend, and it seems to spark the desire to find out what the world thinks of him. It's obvious he's been alone for a long time, enough that legend has built up around him that's as much fiction as fact. He tries to get the minister (Gerald McRaney) to throw a funeral before he dies so he can find out what people would say, but he won't do it. However, a young assistant at the local funeral home, Buddy (Lucas Black) overhears this and realizes the business it could bring to the failing funeral home run by Frank Quinn (Bill Murray). So they offer to set up the "funeral party" for Mr. Bush. While in town, he runs into an old friend (maybe the only person to have really known him), Mattie Darrow (Sissy Spacek).
Everything is going smoothly for the party, but Felix wants to get someone who knows everything about him to tell the truth about it. Whatever is in his past is too hard for him to talk about, and he tries to find an old friend to do it for him. I won't reveal the secrets that come up, but the movie tells the story really well, not giving too much weight to the secret or the past, but reminding us that we all carry them with us. I really liked all the acting in this movie - particularly Lucas Black. I first saw him in Crazy in Alabama with Melanie Griffith. She's over the top, but he's pretty amazing, and now he's grown up to be a pretty powerful screen presence. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Thursday, December 16, 2010
DVD Roundup: Babies and Departures
I didn't intend to watch movies about birth and death, but that's how it turned out. And both were actually more entertaining than their descriptions would suggest. Departures won the Oscar for foreign film in 2009. From Japan, it's a story about a cellist, Daigo, without enough talent to make it his career. When he loses his job, he and his wife return to his hometown and the house his mother left him. Daigo searches for work, and finally finds a job assisting a man, with "departures". The job itself isn't explained for a while, but it pays really well, so he doesn't ask too many questions. From the movie, it seems that most people in Japan are cremated, so there's not much need for skilled undertakers, but there is still a ceremony like a wake where the family watches as the deceased is respectfully and carefully cleaned and prepared for "casketing" (being put into a casket that is then burned with the body). However, as in most cultures, working with dead bodies isn't exactly a prestigious career choice, and his wife finally finds out what he does and leaves. However, Daigo is able to see the beauty in the ceremony as he gets better at it and the families continue to thank him for what he does. It's a beautiful movie with very compelling characters - Daigo has struggled his whole life with his father's abandonment, and even more with never being the best at anything, and finally, what it means to be a grown-up. His wife tries hard to be supportive, but can't get past her own ideas about things. A terrific and thoughtful movie about how people handle death, from respect to distaste and beauty. 4.5/5 lambs - definitely deserved the Oscar!
The second movie focused on the other end of life. Babies is a documentary following the first year of life of 4 very different babies - one in Namibia, Mongolia, Tokyo, and San Francisco. The movie has almost no dialogue (no subtitle either for the other countries), but has lots of music that helps give an upbeat tone to the film. When it was initially released, I remember it being criticized for not being deep, not offering criticism about the different lives of these children. What I found was that it wasn't a movie about comparing and contrasting the different cultures and criticizing one over the other, but rather showing that a baby is a baby is a baby. At least for these babies, the first year of their life was fairly similar. Obviously, when choosing what to put into the film it was easy to pick moments that looked similar - they each had a moment with their cat, some with siblings (talk about bullying!), with their parent being playful, feeding, learning to walk, trying to speak, etc. And the movie might not be deep by offering critique of how babies can thrive growing up naked in the dirt as well as with baby yoga and swaddling. But I think it would have been the lesser for trying. It's a simple look different babies, in all their cutest, tantrums, and loving. 3.5 of 5 stars/lambs
The second movie focused on the other end of life. Babies is a documentary following the first year of life of 4 very different babies - one in Namibia, Mongolia, Tokyo, and San Francisco. The movie has almost no dialogue (no subtitle either for the other countries), but has lots of music that helps give an upbeat tone to the film. When it was initially released, I remember it being criticized for not being deep, not offering criticism about the different lives of these children. What I found was that it wasn't a movie about comparing and contrasting the different cultures and criticizing one over the other, but rather showing that a baby is a baby is a baby. At least for these babies, the first year of their life was fairly similar. Obviously, when choosing what to put into the film it was easy to pick moments that looked similar - they each had a moment with their cat, some with siblings (talk about bullying!), with their parent being playful, feeding, learning to walk, trying to speak, etc. And the movie might not be deep by offering critique of how babies can thrive growing up naked in the dirt as well as with baby yoga and swaddling. But I think it would have been the lesser for trying. It's a simple look different babies, in all their cutest, tantrums, and loving. 3.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Belated Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows review
*Spoilers ahead*
Since I originally missed the first 12 minutes or so of the new Harry Potter, I wanted to be sure I saw the rest before I wrote my review. And it turns out I was right to do so (I'm biased, I know). My first opinion of the film was that it was much funnier than the first 6, with dark parts. This was because I walked in just as the funnier parts were starting. Yes, there was action, but watching lots of people transform into Harry was pretty funny - and Fred and George's humor was hysterical. However, after seeing the very sad and then scary scenes that actually show before the humor, the movie is set up to be very dark, with few moments of levity to lighten the load. Watching Hermione erase her parents' memories, and then watching the DeathEaters at Malfoy manner kill the Muggle studies teacher, you know you've been set up for a very dark film. My opinion of the rest of the film was well talked out in Episode 23 of the Reel Insight podcast. In summary, I thought the acting was much improved over the previous incarnations, particularly Emma Watson's Hermione. This could be because she wasn't forced into false laughter (which always bothered me) and the seriousness between all the characters made for better acting. There were jump in your seat moments when the snake appears in Godric's Hollow, and what were they thinking moments with the silver body paint in Ron's nightmare, but overall, the movie flowed fairly well from moment to moment (with a slight dragging section in the middle, but I didn't mind that part, the good acting helped). I did have a problem with the ending - it didn't feel even a tiny bit complete, but nor did it feel like a cliffhanger (the only acceptable Hollywood ending without resolution). I think they needed to do a bit more with Dobby's funeral to give a feeling of completeness, but since the story was already running so long, they just stopped. Oh well, I'll enjoy watching it again in preparation for Part II. My score remains as previously stated 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Harry Potter review delayed
If you've listened to Reel Insight Episode 23 (and why haven't you?) you'll know that I had a horrific time trying to get into NYC to see Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. While we talked about it and such, my review will wait until I've seen it in its entirety. However, my rating is 4.5 of 5 Lambs/stars, just so people know how I found the overall flick.
Friday, November 5, 2010
"Every Creation Myth Needs a Devil": The Social Network
I'm slow to get a review done, but I wanted to be sure to add my opinion to the noise about this movie. It was a well-made movie that showed a really terrific story that may or may not be completely accurate about the founding and development of FACEBOOK. Mark Zuckerberg (played BRILLIANTLY by Jesse Eisenberg) was obviously an extremely awkward college student (he's fairly clearly some version of autistic or Asperger's) who doesn't care a lot about the niceties of friendship or business. He allegedly partners with a group of guys to create a website for Harvard that would be exclusive. The movie makes it seem like he took a kernel of their idea and created a much better one with the investment from a friend. Eventually he squeezes out the investing friend and makes himself a bajillion dollars. The Social Network flashes between the two court cases when these guys sue him back to the actual events. It's very well composed and the acting is superb. If they continue with 10 Best Picture nominations, I predict this will definitely get one. And so far, Jesse Eisenberg has done of the best acting performances of anyone this year, and will deserve a good look come awards season. There will definitely be a writing nomination at some point too. Not really anything new to add to the many other reviews of The Social Network, but I saw Zombieland the next day and now have a new-found respect and admiration for Eisenberg that nearly wipes away Adventureland. 4.5 of 5 lambs/stars
Monday, July 19, 2010
What I learned from Inception
There are all kinds of movies that defy a description. To say that Inception is Christopher Nolan's movie about a guy who can infiltrate people's dreams to extract secrets on behalf of industrial espionage is like saying the Statue of Liberty is a tall, green, woman who stands on an island in New York City's harbor. Both are true, but neither description captures the experience of seeing them. So, to avoid selling it short, I'll just describe what I learned from watching the movie.
1. Leonardo DiCaprio's acting skills continue to improve, particularly when his hair doesn't become an issue.
2. The experience of falling and then startling awake is more universal than I expected.
3. Ellen Page has risen above her previous role as a smart-alecky teen. She can also be a smart-alecky young adult. Also, she can show emotion and do a great job as DiCaprio's conscience.
4. I still love Joseph Gordon-Levitt. See The Lookout and (500) Days of Summer.
5. Ken Wantanbe was terrific in The Last Samurai (best part of the film) and somehow forgot how to enunciate - I think it missed almost half of his dialogue.
6. Physics is what keeps us from walking up walls, and that you can't fall in zero gravity, but that an elevator might help. Seriously, the special effects were terrific, particularly JGL's fight scene, but I think they missed a terrific opportunity for seriously trippy effects.
7. Marion Cotillard has added bad-ass to her skills at morose and annoying.
I really, really liked the movie, I promise. Imaginative, gripping, mysterious, and thoroughly rewatchable, if only to understand all the things you missed before. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
1. Leonardo DiCaprio's acting skills continue to improve, particularly when his hair doesn't become an issue.
2. The experience of falling and then startling awake is more universal than I expected.
3. Ellen Page has risen above her previous role as a smart-alecky teen. She can also be a smart-alecky young adult. Also, she can show emotion and do a great job as DiCaprio's conscience.
4. I still love Joseph Gordon-Levitt. See The Lookout and (500) Days of Summer.
5. Ken Wantanbe was terrific in The Last Samurai (best part of the film) and somehow forgot how to enunciate - I think it missed almost half of his dialogue.
6. Physics is what keeps us from walking up walls, and that you can't fall in zero gravity, but that an elevator might help. Seriously, the special effects were terrific, particularly JGL's fight scene, but I think they missed a terrific opportunity for seriously trippy effects.
7. Marion Cotillard has added bad-ass to her skills at morose and annoying.
I really, really liked the movie, I promise. Imaginative, gripping, mysterious, and thoroughly rewatchable, if only to understand all the things you missed before. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs
Monday, May 17, 2010
Musical Mondays! RENT
First and foremost, Rent is a Broadway musical. I was really excited when I heard they were bringing this Pulitzer-prize winning show to the big screen, but nervous because I wasn't sure how it would work. Would they just do a filmed version on the stage, or actually make it a legitimate film. They found a good middle ground, taking the elements of staging and movement from the stage, but incorporating elements that are only possible on film, such as dream sequences, memories, etc. while the music was going on. Rent is a rock opera, which usually means all the dialogue is sung, between actual songs. For the film, they took some of the dialogue-type music and made it a spoken rather than sung, though not for everything thank goodness or it would have lost some of the characteristic charm of the stage production. The biggest thrill for seeing the film is that they used nearly the entire original cast (Rosario Dawson replaced an actress who was pregnant, though possibly also for big-name status).
In case you missed this phenomenon in the late 90s, here's a sum up of the story. Mark (Anthony Rapp) and Roger (Adam Pascal) are roommates on the lower east side of Manhattan called Alphabet City (the avenues in that section are no longer numbered like 5th Avenue, but become Avenue A, B, C, D) in 1989, Christmas Eve. Roger has HIV and wants to write a song he'll be remembered for ("One Song, Glory"), and Mark is an aspiring documentary filmmaker. Their former roommate Benny (Taye Diggs) wants to collect their rent since he just bought their building and some others ("Rent"). In exchange for deferred rent, he wants them to shut down a protest that's brewing against the neighborhood changes, organized by Mark's ex, drama queen Maureen (Idina Menzel). Maureen's new girlfriend, Joanne (Tracie Thoms) can't get the sound equipment set up for the concert, and Mark shows up and they lament dating Maureen ("Tango Maureen"). Another former roommate, Collins (Jesse L. Martin) and his new "girlfriend" Angel (Wilson Jermaine Heredia) - both HIV+ - arrive to help out. To get everyone out of the apartments, Benny cuts the power, and neighbor Mimi (Rosario Dawson) goes to ask Roger to help her ("Light My Candle" - my favorite song when I first saw it). The protest goes off well ("Over the Moon") and Mark sells his footage of it to the news. Roger and Mimi also realize they're both HIV+ and that they can make it work (. The end of the first act is the best scene of the whole show "La Vie Boheme", where the whole group sings about the bohemian life they lead, open minded, with lots of cultural and pop references (here are the lyrics). The movie then does a bit of a good cheat, with music overlaying some fun images of the week between Christmas and New Year's. The second act has more problems, with Angel getting sick and dying ("I'll cover you"), and Roger going away to write his song, and Mimi and Benny getting together, and Joanne and Maureen getting engaged (different from the play) and then breaking up ("Take Me or Leave Me"). Meanwhile, Mark has 'sold his soul' to take a job for a sleazy TV show, working for Sarah Silverman's Alexi Darling. It's a really small part, but she brings a non-entity on stage to life well. Even though it's a story about coming of age in a time of AIDS, poverty, violence, gay and straight, and all, it's still a Broadway musical, and things work out pretty well by the end. The final song in the play is "Seasons of Love", but the movie puts it right at the beginning, and not as part of the movie, just all the characters standing in their own spotlights, in costume, on stage singing. The music is revived at the end of the movie while they watch Mark's documentary about them all over the past year. The movie does a good job bringing it to life a brilliant play and musical without losing the feel of the original work. Also, having the original cast makes the voices really familiar if you're only familiar with the soundtrack. I loved the play - I saw it my sophomore year of college on Broadway, then again my senior year, and once since college. And I watch the movie now at least annually to be reminded of the overarching messages the music provides, which became the tagline for the film: "No Day But Today", meaning you never know what's going to claim you in the future, live for today. Stage version 5+ of 5 stars, film 4.5 of 5 stars for it's originality at bringing a stage play to the screen.

Friday, March 12, 2010
DVD Round Up: Precious and Whip It!


Labels:
3 stars,
4.5 stars,
DVD,
Oscar Nominations,
Oscar winners
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Two newish releases and two DVDs: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh...
A week of vacation thankfully brings lots of movie viewing, not much of high quality though. I saw Valentine's Day and Crazy Heart in theaters, and Post Grad and The Boys are Back on DVD. I'll start with the good, and then you can skip down to the others you're actually interested in.
Crazy Heart was really terrific. Jeff Bridges is definitely going to win his long-deserved Oscar and in my opinion totally deserves it. I really liked this movie, though my movie-viewing partner wasn't convinced. Bridges plays Bad Blake, a semi-washed up, boozy, greasy, charming, talented country musician. He's playing in Santa Fe, and as a favor to the piano player he agrees to an interview by the local music reporter, Maggie Gyllenhaal. Since he puts the moves on everything, he flirts with Gyllenhaal, who seems attracted to him, but is smart enough to know what a one-night stand she'd be. She also has a young son she's concerned about leaving for long. However, Bad Blake is incredibly charming beyond his former star status and she succumbs. However, Blake has to keep touring as he's mostly broke. His former protegee, Tommy Sweet (Colin Farrell) asks him to open his show, and to write some new material for him to record. They obviously have a tumultuous relationship, but Farrell does a good job seeming sincere in his admiration for his former mentor. This is definitely a cliched movie about what happens to an alcoholic while he attempts to hit bottom, and the people who love him and watch him go down trying not to go with him (Gyllenhall does the best job I've ever seen of the woman in these type of movies - she stays strong and only gives him the single chance he deserves to change his ways and then she leaves). However, because Bridges is so charismatic and charming, I loved watching every minute he was on the screen. And finally, the music is absolutely fantastic. In general, I don't care for watching long scenes where a pretend character sings the pretend songs that made him famous that he sings forever (Walk the Line and Ray were different because I already knew the music and it was the representation of the real artist that was interesting). However, probably because these songs were written or produced or influenced by an actual amazing musician, T-Bone Burnett, the music is a joy to hear and watch performed by Jeff Bridges, Colin Farrell and unknown others. It's great music. There's a line from Bad Blake in the movie that goes something like: "All the great songs sound like you've heard them before" and that basically describes the music. They're good because they resemble the greatest songs of country music. I really liked this movie, 4.5 stars/lambs (missing the .5 for being really cliched about addiction and famous people).
However, Valentine's Day just barely lived up to the hype created around it. While there were some story lines I really enjoyed - Julia Roberts and Bradly Cooper, both on the airplane and on the ground; Anne Hathaway as an adult entertainment provider (by phone) and Topher Grace; and Ashton Kutcher and Jennifer Garner as friends and the final scene of the movie. The others were either boring, terrible acting, or both. I hated Taylor Swift every time she was on screen (she's a terrific musician, but NOT an actor), and you could see Taylor Lautner (not an oscar-contender himself) cringing in all their scenes together. The other teenage couple were just boring in their attempt to have sex on Valentine's day. And the Mcpair of Patrick Dempsey and Eric Dane were just boring, cute but boring. Jessica Biel's story line about hating Valentine's Day came across more pathetic than empowered, but her relationship with Jamie Foxx was interesting. This ensemble rom-com is MUCH better than last year's He's Just Not that Into You", but it's not as perfect as the casting would suggest. Removing some of the stories and increasing the depth of others would have made for the perfect Valentine's Day treat. 3 of 5 lambs/stars
So you've had the Good and the Meh for this post. There's not much to say about the bad, particularly Post Grad which I actually fast forwarded because NOTHING happened and it was incredibly boring. The cast is pretty impressive with Alexis Bledel, Zach Gilford (I love Friday Night Lights so I'll forgive him this attempt to hit the big screen), Michael Keaton, Jane Lynch and J.K. Simmons. Sadly, Bledel graduates from college, has trouble getting a job, is too arrogant to take anything that will make money and lives with her parents. Gilford is in love with Bledel and doesn't want to go to law school until she loves him too, but his dad, Simmons, is forcing him out. Keaton is crazy and Lynch is funny, but that's the entire movie. 1 lamb/star
The Boys are Back is slightly better, just not great. Clive Owen plays a recently widowed sports reporter father in Australia who has to figure out how to raise his 5-year old son. However, he's also got a 14-year old son from a previous marriage that he realizes he's abandoned. His attempts to be a working father are heart felt and well intentioned, but of course don't work. This movie has been done in other place and in other ways where child-rearing is left to the children and the dad's theory of no rules always back fires. The actor who plays Owen's older son Harry, George MacKay, could have been Ron Weasley if he'd been older when they started. Totally looks the part so I had trouble taking his angst seriously. However, it's not terrible, just Meh. 2.5 of 5 lambs/stars




Friday, January 1, 2010
An Adrian Brody Two-fer: The Brother's Bloom and Cadillac Records

The Brothers Bloom finally puts Mark Ruffalo into a character different from others he's played - a scummy not so great guy, and he obviously revels in it. He plays Brody's older brother, Stephen, and the pair of them have been con men since childhood. However, now Brody, called Bloom - I never figured out the title, since they have no last names, one is Stephen (Ruffalo) and one is Bloom (Brody), but it doesn't seem important. Anyway now Bloom wants out of their life, and Stephen talks him into one more con with their silent partner in crime, Rinko Kikuchi (Oscar nominee from Babel). They decide to try to con a rich lonely eccentric woman, Rachel Weisz, who learns hobbies of all sorts and falls into their con with ease. However, this is the last time I fully understood what was going on. A complicated series of cons take place, some with Penelope's (Weisz) help and some for other reasons. It's a great movie with funny dialogue and a morose looking Brody all the way through. Ruffalo and his ideas for cons are funny, and the supporting cast is terrific - Rinko is wonderfully funny while saying almost nothing (maybe she doesn't speak English well, but they used it to perfection. 4 of 5 stars/lambs

Oh, and a PS - Don't watch Two Lovers with Joaquin Phoenix and Gwenyth Paltrow - it's awful. Worst movie of 2009.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Random round-up!

Away We Go stars SNL alum Maya Rudolph and The Office's John Krasinski as expectant parents. They've moved to be near his parents for the birth of their baby, only to be told his parents - Catherine O'Hara and Jeff Daniels - are moving to Belgium. Untethered by either family or jobs, they decide to find a new place to live near people they know. Thus begins a journey of some of the most extreme characters ever. Allison Janney is a vulgar ex-boss in Tuscon, Maggie Gyllenhaal is an over the top mother in Wisconsin, and Melanie Lynsky is a perfect mom of lots of adopted kids in Montreal. We watch Rudolph and Krasinski's voyage to find a place to live, as well as discover what kind of parents they want and DON'T want to be. Their dialogue provides most of the humor of the movie, quick and sharp, as they discuss the crazies they thought they might want to live near. I thought it was a really good, very original movie, carefully constructed to avoid cliche, but almost misses the mark. It could easily have been really boring, but the strength of the cast makes the movie thoroughly enjoyable. 4 of 5 stars/lambs



Ballet Shoes
I've Loved You So Long
How About You
Away We Go
Saturday, November 28, 2009
The Blind Side: Review

The following review explains a lot of what I like about the movie, and thus might contain spoilers, but as it's a true story (or based on one) of a currently living, well-known individual, if you don't already know much of it, you're a little behind anyway.
Insight's Rules for adapting a true story for film:
1. Most viewers know how it turns out - that's not the interesting part, focus on how he or she arrived at the point everyone knows about.
2. If the end point is good, find whatever needed to be overcome to arrive at the good. If the end point is bad, focus on what good was lost to reach the bad. DON'T pretend something is good or bad if it isn't. To relate to audiences it has to be something EVERYONE knows to be good or bad, and not just in relative terms.
3. Very few things in life continue on an all up or all down path. Most stories are filled with ups and downs, make sure those count.
4. If you want people to like your movie and not just respect it, don't end a very sad story with a single moment of happiness, you have to prove to people that watching the whole sad story was worth it to them, and not just the real person who is now happy (I'm looking at you The Pursuit of Happyness).
The best movies based on true stories use these rules, but the stories they adapt for the screen have more than the sum of these parts, usually a main character worth caring about. The best movies have an entire cast you can find a reason to care about. Sandra Bullock's new movie, The Blind Side, is based on a true story of a young black boy, Michael Oher, in Memphis who has fallen through the cracks of his family, his community and the state, but has figured out a way to take care of himself. He's lucky enough to have a friend who helps him get into a private school, where he can barely be bothered with classes or sports. However, he isn't bitter or mean, he's just quiet and accepting of anything that comes his way, both good and bad. When he's spotted walking down the cold street at night, Sandra Bullock's Leigh Anne Touhy, brings him home for a warm place to sleep, without the realization that there are kids who attend her children's school who have nothing and no one to help them. His story is heartbreaking, both to Leigh Anne, and to the people watching it unfold. We watch as the Touhy's are changed by having Michael in their lives, and how his life is changed, even if he's still the same person he always was. It's a pretty funny movie as we watch Michael learn to play football, and Leigh Anne's tough love of the entire world as she struggles to be a good person. Sandra Bullock is terrific as a tough-ass southern woman making things happen. She takes life seriously, but knows that she is lucky to have everything she has, and is happy to have Michael in their lives. It's mostly their story, but her family, Tim McGraw as her husband, and her two kids, play a huge part of making a family that includes Michael. Of course, since Michael ends up playing for the Baltimore Ravens, there's a lot of football in the movie too. That is part of the ups and downs. While everyone assumes a big guy like Michael should be a natural at football, he takes a while to learn the basics, much to everyone's frustration, and amusement. Overall, this is a terrific movie, and obeys all my rules, so you leave feeling wonderful about life, even if you can't forget that it doesn't work out for everyone. 4.5 stars/lambs.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
A Christmas Carol 3D: Review

Monday, August 31, 2009
DVD Round-up

The second movie I saw is one of the best sports movie I've ever seen. The Express stars Rob

Wednesday, August 19, 2009
The Time Traveler's Wife: Review (minor spoilers)
Obviously, if you've already read the novel upon which the movie is based, this review won't contain any spoilers. However, if you've not read or heard anything about it, this might reveal a bit more than you'd like. Here's the summary of what I thought first, then I'll add specifics. I really liked it. The Time Traveler's Wife is a wonderful love story with a bit of a fantasy (or futuristic) spin. 4.5 of 5 stars/lambs, not quite perfect, but there were elements of the book I similarly thought weren't great and the movie was wonderfully faithful to the book.
Now, the specifics of what I liked and why. Eric Bana stars as Henry DeTamble, a research librarian who has one small anomaly, he un-willfully travels through time. He can't control where or to when he goes or even when he'll return to normal time. When he's in his 30s and 40s he travels back in time and meets a little girl named Claire. Claire spends her life growing up and becoming friends and ultimately falling in love with Henry, even though he only visits as an older man and infrequently. However, they meet when they're both in their 20s. Claire has known him her whole life, but in his 20s, Henry has not yet met Claire. That's sort of where the movie starts, and then follows Claire's life in real time, with flash backs and forwards following Henry. As I'd hoped, the movie is much easier to follow than the book, which just gives you dates and the characters ages to keep you oriented, while the movie gives you actual images of each person at a given age to compare (they grey Henry's hair, cut Claire's hair, etc.). We follow Claire and Henry through falling in love, marriage, and children, all the while struggling with how to understand and deal with Henry's "condition". While I never picked up on the underlying messages in the book, the time travel and the love story is too strong, the movie does a terrific job, mostly with the acting, of introducing greater themes the material is exploring. The idea that the person you love could have a disease, disability or "condition" is one that many if not all couples will someday deal with, and we get to watch as Claire (a wonderful Rachel McAdams) struggles with trying to hate the "condition" and not the man. I think she reaches an equilibrium and questions whether it's fair have to love someone with this condition and how you can get through it. Okay, that was the weightier theme that I really liked. The other issue they do a terrific job of demonstrating is the concept of fate and choice. If Henry will eventually always go back in time and meet Claire, does she really have any choice but to fall in love with him when she meets him again as an adult? If he knows the house they will eventually live in, does he have to search until he finds that house, or can he choose whatever he wants? They do a good job of explaining their paradigm of time travel in the film. It's a great love story too, Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana have great chemistry. Also, the supporting characters of Ron Livingston (currently in "Defying Gravity" on ABC which is a great series so far) and Stephen Tobolowsky as Dr. Kendrick who helps the couple figure out how to keep their fetus from time traveling before it's born. I cried very hard at the end, and that's all I'll say. Terrific movie for anyone who likes love stories, sci-fi, fantasy or great acting.

Monday, August 10, 2009
Julie and Julia, parallel adventures that are nothing alike

Sunday, March 29, 2009
DVD Review: Role Models (more reasons to love Paul Rudd)

Monday, February 16, 2009
Oscar nominations review: Doubt

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
2 stars
2.5 stars
3 stars
3.5 stars
4 stars
4.5 stars
5 lambs
5 stars
Alphabet Meme
Animated movies
British TV
Christmas
Comments
DVD
Father's Day
Favela Rising
Friday Night Lights
Golden Globes
Independent film
LAMB
Lists
Monday musicals
Movie meme
New Releases
Oscar Nominations
Oscar winners
Random
Reel Insight
Robert Downey Jr.
TV Shows
TV meme
The West Wing
Top-Grossing
Tuesdays
action movie
actors
actresses
awards
bad movies
battlestar galactica
best movies
blockbusters
blog cabins
bloggers
characters
chick flicks
classics
comedy
documentary
dramas
emmys
epic
family films
fashion
females
final season
foreign films
friends
good movies
great cast
guest post
holidays
james mcavoy
kevin smith
kids
kids movies
marketing mistakes
movie from book
movies
music from movies
musicals
old movies
period pieces
podcasts
predictions
romance
sci-fi
songs
sports
straight to DVD
summer candy
why i love