James Cameron has truly changed the art of movie-making in many ways. The ability to actually capture an actor's performance and then morph that performance into a different species with different shapes and environments is amazing. The sci-fi genre may never be the same (or many others either, given the imagination of Hollywood). However, he's still James Cameron, and wrote the movie too, so the inspiration of other movies in the past kept hitting me. The one that keeps sticking is that Avatar is what might have happened if Dances with Wolves had ended differently. However, the movie-making skill and futuristic (rather than historic) story gave Cameron the chance to tell a story without stooping to basic cliches. He only spends moments (in a very long 160 minute movie) describing how avatars work, or Worthington learning the language, or basic information about the Navi. But the collective whole of the movie gives you all the information you need to understand a beautiful story. Much of the back story is told through voice-overs from Worthington's video diaries. I went in knowing how long the movie would be, so I was conscious of when trimming might have been done, and honestly there were few moments even a couple of seconds could be cut, and definitely never an entire scene.
▼
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Avatar: Review (minor spoilers)
James Cameron has truly changed the art of movie-making in many ways. The ability to actually capture an actor's performance and then morph that performance into a different species with different shapes and environments is amazing. The sci-fi genre may never be the same (or many others either, given the imagination of Hollywood). However, he's still James Cameron, and wrote the movie too, so the inspiration of other movies in the past kept hitting me. The one that keeps sticking is that Avatar is what might have happened if Dances with Wolves had ended differently. However, the movie-making skill and futuristic (rather than historic) story gave Cameron the chance to tell a story without stooping to basic cliches. He only spends moments (in a very long 160 minute movie) describing how avatars work, or Worthington learning the language, or basic information about the Navi. But the collective whole of the movie gives you all the information you need to understand a beautiful story. Much of the back story is told through voice-overs from Worthington's video diaries. I went in knowing how long the movie would be, so I was conscious of when trimming might have been done, and honestly there were few moments even a couple of seconds could be cut, and definitely never an entire scene.
Sam Worthington seems to be the next rising star. With starring roles in the last Terminator film, Avatar, and the upcoming Clash of the Titans remake, I'm looking forward to where his career might take him.
ReplyDeleteAvatar is indeed a feast for the eyes and soul, and while it's plot is more basic and unoriginal than some of the other best picture contenders for this year (I think it's to be expected when you spend $300 million on a movie that it's capable of appealing to a larger audience to make that back), as a whole, Avatar is a refreshing blockbuster. James Cameron seems to be one of the few directors who can shoot a CGI battle without dizzying or confusing the viewer(I'm looking at you Michael Bay).
Anyway, glad to see you've joined the Avatar fan train.
I was really on the fence with this, but you may have swayed me into the I think I need to see this category. Have a wonderful new year's.
ReplyDeleteWow, you liked it a lot more than I did, but our reviews really do say almost exactly the same thing! Eerie.
ReplyDeleteDavid, thanks for your comments! I think you put it really well, he thought a lot about the people who would be watching it and wanted a general appeal type movie.
ReplyDeleteButtercup, I think you'd like it best in 2D, unless imax is available, then it would be awesome.